Why Lost is such a real achievement in film

Your movie-blogger just spent a delightful several hours looking at the fifth season of “Lost”, now out on DVD.

Now in its sixth and final season, the epic sci-fi adventure, with a now-stellar cast, terrific production values, actual character-arcs, clever plot turns, good acting, and first-rate on-location special effects (overseen by local boy Archie Ahuna, now an Emmy winner).

What calls itself science-fiction on television is rarely that—-not far out enough in terms of sustained ideas, mostly just westerns or trite morality plays set in space, and wooden acting. (Battlestar Galactica is a notable exception.)

In the fifth season, some of the most “outlandish” conceits were credibly and cleverly explained (often only by visuals): the mysterious Polar bears, the “others,” the Dharma initiative, the time-shifts, the re-appearance of “dead” characters, the motivations of arch villain Charles Widmore. People who thought that Lost was making it up as it went along, painting itself into a corner, must now re-think. At least some of the shenanigans were planned early in advance.

It’s probably the most adventurous and hard-working on-location shoot in tv history, re-establishing Hawai’i, which did have a bad reputation, as a viable place for extensive filming.

In this blogger’s opinion Lost ranks as one of the three best five-plus season dramas, up there with The Wire and The X-Files.

The acting, particularly that of Terry O’Quinn (John Locke) and Michael Emerson (Ben), has been a cut above most tv series. Evangeline Lilly has improved amazingly as an actress, right up there with Gillian Anderson in X-Files, and underrated (and unnominated) Matthew Fox (Jack) has been the blue holding lots of jigsaw pieces together until the entire plotline can be revealed by end of season six.

Rather than save money by moving back to Hollywood for the last two seasons, the series stayed in Hawai’i, despite temperamental weather, and provided fresh scenic locations.

Why Sandra Bullock will win the Oscar for best actress on March 7—an analysis

The Blind Side, a surprise hit at, as of this writing, has grossed more than $240 million, and earned an Oscar nom for its star, 45 year old Sandra Bullock, whose first-rate performance as a Christian mother whose family takes in an African-American football player, surprised some. Bullock’s acting chops for dramatic stuff was strongly revealed in a little indie called Infamous when she played writer Harper Lee;

Why will Bullock triumph over Meryl Streep, who deserves the Oscar? Here is a list of the (slightly cynical) reasons.

  1. Bullock, with two hits this year (The Proposal and Blind Side), has never won. Streep, with two wins and l5 nominations, is too on-the-nose, as they say in la-la land.

  2. It’s an acknowledgement of the Christian audience, who really got behind the Blind Side release.

  3. It’s a “family film,” usually in short supply as Oscar material.

  4. Bullock also produces some of her movies.

  5. It’s Bullock’s “turn”.

Gambling ain’t sexy

“There is in Hollywood, as in all cultures in which gambling is the central activity, a lowered sexual-energy, an inability to devote more than token attention to the preoccupations of the society outside.” –Joan Didion

Hurt Locker on DVD

Hurt Locker, our choice of Best Movie of 2009 (in a tie with Up In the Air), comes out on DVD the this week. Just watch this superior suspenser pile up the awards in the upcoming awards season.

Jeremy Renner with Jimmy Kimmel (Parts 1 and 2)

Hulu.com has the opening sequence [http://www.hulu.com/watch/81586/movie-trailers-the-hurt-locker---opening-sequence] posted (R-rated, for account holders only).

Broken Embraces

Almodovar’s new film—Broken Embraces, starring Penelope Cruz—opened here last week, and it’s intriguing and (perhaps) complicated, in the film-within-a-film way that post-modernist Spanish directors seem to prefer.

Almodovar is never wildly popular in Hawaii, but his smallish following is tenacious and loyal. They’ll be rewarded with another study of passion and compromised love at which this director excels.

Interview with Penelope Cruz

Trailer (in Spanish, no less)

Boys to men

“Find out the movies a man saw between ten and fifteen, which ones he liked, disliked, and you would have a pretty good idea of what sort of mind and temperament he has.” –Gore Vidal

Norman Mailer and Gore Vidal Feud on the Dick Cavett Show

Gore Vidal about his life on and off the page (you’ll need to first wade through the near-interminable list of sponsors)

[if the embedded video doesn’t work watch on Google Video.]

Coming to the Big Pineapple

Through my alleged Hollywood agent, who’s seen everything (member of the writers’ guild) the following upcoming movies, not yet in the Big Bromeliad (pineapple), are worth seeing.

The Last Station – Helen Mirren and Chris Plummer in the last days of Tolstoy.

Greenburg – new Indie by Noah Baumbach (The Squid and the Whale), this one a comedy.

Crazy Heart – Jeff Bridges’ new Oscar chance

Chole – Atom Egoyan’s new thriller, with Julianne Moore and Liam Neeson.

A Single Man – Tom Ford directs Colin Firth in screen version of the Christopher Isherwood novel. Gay drama.

The Yellow Handkerchief – late love, with William Hurt splendid.

Don’t miss…

Two wonderful stop-action movies this last year: Coraline and Fantastic Mr. Fox

When it surfaces on DVD, give Moon a try. Sci-fi with the underrated Sam Rockwell. It actually is sci-fi, not a western set in outer space.

Also see Jane Campion’s Bright Star. It sank without a trace at the box-office, but shouldn’t have.

Also, we cautiously recommend The Soloist, mostly for the performances.

Try to take a look at the trailer for the upcoming Salt, with Angelina Jolie in action mode. Wow (if we may say so).

Pssst, Jason

News keeps surfacing that Jason Scott Lee wants to direct. Might we suggest a re-make of Man Facing Southeast (l986) (review with spoilers, trailer) starring Lee and maybe his buddy Daniel Dae Kim? Just a (humble-esque) suggestion.

Ageism & the movies

The news that Clint Eastwood will direct part of his new supernatural-themed movie on Maui in January brings this question: why don’t many older directors, like Eastwood, get to direct films?

Answer: It’s costly. Eastwood passed a rigorous physical exam, but, usually, older directors have to have a substitute director, paid, on set to take over in case of illness or death. Take, for example, the late Robert Altman. During the shooting of what proved to be his last movie—Prairie Home Companion—director Paul Thomas Anderson (There Will Be Blood) was on set, and paid, everyday of the High Def shoot. All went well, but the additional money prohibits many films from employing beloved elders. (This also applies to certain older actors as well.)